Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 18:15:23 +0200 From: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> Cc: Eric Lemar <eric.lemar@isilon.com>, arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD Message-ID: <20070608161523.GB27624@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0706072147440.28966@sea.ntplx.net> References: <20070604162430.GA76813@freebsd.org> <896DB1FBFFD5A145833D9DA08CA12A85051A7F@seaxch07.desktop.isilon.com> <20070606074429.GA42032@freebsd.org> <4666F0FB.8020101@FreeBSD.org> <20070607070455.GA71012@freebsd.org> <896DB1FBFFD5A145833D9DA08CA12A85051A84@seaxch07.desktop.isilon.com> <20070607210313.GA603@freebsd.org> <896DB1FBFFD5A145833D9DA08CA12A85051A87@seaxch07.desktop.isilon.com> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0706072147440.28966@sea.ntplx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> It looks like draft 3 will be released June 15, 2007 (in 10 days). is it ok to have this committed after June 15 (afaik the branching day)? maybe without the native syscalls but with the kern_fooat() backend. (ie. *at syscalls can be added for 7.1R with a few lines patch) roman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070608161523.GB27624>