Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 08 Jun 2007 11:24:21 -0700
From:      "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net>
To:        Stephen.Clark@seclark.us
Cc:        Tom Evans <tevans.uk@googlemail.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: upgrade 6.2 to xorg 7.2 
Message-ID:  <20070608182421.CBAF545042@ptavv.es.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 08 Jun 2007 12:45:34 EDT." <466987AE.70503@seclark.us> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--==_Exmh_1181327061_81135P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

> Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 12:45:34 -0400
> From: Stephen Clark <Stephen.Clark@seclark.us>
> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
> 
> Tom Evans wrote:
> 
> >On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 09:22 -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
> >  
> >
> >>Hello List,
> >>
> >>A few weeks ago I installed 6.2. I did a cvsup of the ports and now 
> >>anytime I try to make
> >>anything that uses X I get something like the following:
> >>
> >>===>  Patching for tk-8.5.a.6_1
> >>===>  Applying FreeBSD patches for tk-8.5.a.6_1
> >>===>   tk-8.5.a.6_1 depends on file: /usr/local/libdata/xorg/libraries - 
> >>not found
> >>===>    Verifying install for /usr/local/libdata/xorg/libraries in 
> >>/usr/ports/x11/xorg-libraries
> >>Read /usr/ports/UPDATING for the procedure to upgrade or install xorg 7.2.
> >>*** Error code 1
> >>
> >>
> >>I have been following the thread on xorg 7.2.
> >>
> >>The /usr/src/UPDATING says under caveats
> >>"Make sure you have the x11/xorg meta-port installed"
> >>
> >>When I run make  in the x11/xorg dir I get  the following which
> >>says use portupgrade if you want to upgrade X.Org.
> >>
> >>
> >>/usr/ports/x11/xorg]# make
> >>This is a meta-port, meaning that it just depends on its subparts of the 
> >>port.
> >>It won't build and install all the parts until you have typed make install
> >>This port does not ensure things are upgraded; use portupgrade if you 
> >>want to
> >>upgrade X.Org.  If you simply type 'make install' it may use over 2GB to 
> >>build
> >>all of the subports.  You can install the ports singly if you are low on 
> >>space.
> >>
> >>So now which is it?
> >>
> >>Use the meta port or portupgrade?
> >>
> >>Thanks,
> >>Steve
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >I'd read /usr/ports/UPDATING again, if you follow the exact instructions
> >  
> >
>                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I have it printed out sitting right 
> in front of me.
> 
> >in that file, you won't have many problems.
> >  
> >
> But what about this paragraph under caveats from /usr/ports/UPDATING:
> 
> "Make sure you have the x11/xorg meta-port installed.  If you do not have
>   this meta-port installed with X.Org 6.9, you will miss out on a lot of
>   the new X.Org 7.2 sub-ports."

Do you have xorg-6.9 installed before starting? If not, you might well
want to install it after the upgrade. If it is already installed, it
will be automatically upgraded, so don't worry about it.

That said, my experience in updating about a dozen systems is to roll
the ports tree back to before 7.2 was committed and install xorg
(portinstall xorg) before starting the upgrade. It's not essential that
you do so, but it does eliminate some rough edges in the upgrade as the
main test case was almost certainly with xorg-6.9 installed on systems
prior to the upgrade.
-- 
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: oberman@es.net			Phone: +1 510 486-8634
Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4  EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751

--==_Exmh_1181327061_81135P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 06/03/2002

iD8DBQFGaZ7Vkn3rs5h7N1ERAukiAJ0Tdn7bp2fRjtRsnkewnCybg4nJTgCfWIi9
wPVXDPRCPSIxeVeUcULxw00=
=4iHI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==_Exmh_1181327061_81135P--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070608182421.CBAF545042>