Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:29:18 +0700 (ICT)
From:      Olivier Nicole <on@cs.ait.ac.th>
To:        reko.turja@liukuma.net
Cc:        peter@placidpublishing.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Spamassassin RBL's
Message-ID:  <200706120929.l5C9TImI088357@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th>
In-Reply-To: <004201c7acd0$3465f2a0$0a0aa8c0@rivendell> (reko.turja@liukuma.net)
References:  <11046174.post@talk.nabble.com> <466C2D0F.3040708@webanoide.org><11050907.post@talk.nabble.com> <466C5069.1000903@vindaloo.com><11051531.post@talk.nabble.com> <20070612163811.75d813d5@localhost> <004201c7acd0$3465f2a0$0a0aa8c0@rivendell>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The directive above tells  postfix to add information into 
> headers that tell Amavis the mail was sent by someone who was 
> authenticated by the system and thus trusted.

I expect that the above mentionned headers cannot be forged. Else that
would be a nice way for spam to avoid filtering.

Beside, I am not sure it is a good measure to disable Amavis for any
email. First goal of amavis is virus scanning, even a
trusted/authenticated sender could have his machine infected and could
be spreading viruses.

My 2 cents.

Olivier



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200706120929.l5C9TImI088357>