Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 16:08:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> To: arch@freebsd.org Subject: wakeup_flags patch. Message-ID: <20070701160540.Y552@10.0.0.1>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/wakeupflags.diff It didn't workout very cleanly since the flags have to go through three layers. I could define wakeup and sleepq flags to be the same and skip a bunch of conditionals. However, we'd then have to know which flags were free to use in each case. Are there any further opinions on the style? This patch does not include an implementation for WAKEUP_LOCAL. I'm still working on that in SCHED_SMP. Ironically, it does include an implementation for WAKEUP_TAIL, however, I don't have any users of that. :-) Thanks, Jeff
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070701160540.Y552>