Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 11 Aug 2007 21:29:23 +0200
From:      Max Laier <max@love2party.net>
To:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Cc:        Rong-en Fan <grafan@gmail.com>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject:   Re: panic: sleeping thread owns a non-sleepable lock
Message-ID:  <200708112129.29751.max@love2party.net>
In-Reply-To: <20070811191835.GA28716@rot26.obsecurity.org>
References:  <6eb82e0708111122g7e36b725h19ede889e4bbc9d6@mail.gmail.com> <20070811191835.GA28716@rot26.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart13802235.cdYHEPnHO5
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Saturday 11 August 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 02:22:35AM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> > I'm running 7.0-CURRENT as of  yesterday, and it's very easy
> > to make it panic:
> >
> > Sleeping thread (tid 100065, pid 1066) owns a non-sleepable lock
> > sched_switch(c50a1600,0,1,1c7a7e4,4217e5,...) at sched_switch+0x190
> > mi_switch(1,0) at mi_switch+0x13f
> > sleepq_switch(c50a1600,0,c078a4e2,21b,c07e3820,...) at
> > sleepq_switch+0x87 sleepq_wait(c07e3820,0,c0770b7e,3,0,...) at
> > sleepq_wait+0x36 _sx_xlock_hard(c07e3820,c50a1600,0,0,0,...) at
> > _sx_xlock_hard+0x21d
> > fr_checknatout(f9c7a8d0,f9c7a8cc,64,c57ad900,c4de7400,...) at
> > fr_checknatout+0x29d
> > fr_check(c8cc4644,14,c4de7400,1,f9c7a9b4,...) at fr_check+0x9b1
> > fr_check_wrapper(0,f9c7a9b4,c4de7400,2,c54dab28,...) at
> > fr_check_wrapper+0x3f
> > pfil_run_hooks(c08057c0,f9c7aa4c,c4de7400,2,c54dab28,...) at
> > pfil_run_hooks+0x74 ip_output(c8cc4600,0,f9c7aa10,0,0,...) at
> > ip_output+0x913
> > tcp_output(cae322d0,cb277200,0,0,0,...) at tcp_output+0x1106
> > tcp_usr_send(c51e7318,0,cb277200,0,0,...) at tcp_usr_send+0x240
> > kern_sendfile(c50a1600,f9c7acfc,0,0,0,...) at kern_sendfile+0x1037
> > sendfile(c50a1600,f9c7acfc,20,16,f9c7ad2c,...) at sendfile+0xa8
> > syscall(f9c7ad38) at syscall+0x315
> > Xint0x80_syscall() at Xint0x80_syscall+0x20
> > --- syscall (393, FreeBSD ELF32, sendfile), eip =3D 0x28290bff, esp =3D
> > 0xbfbfc6ac, ebp =3D 0xbfbfe718 ---
>
> What is the lock it holds, and where is it acquired?

My bet is on the pfil rwlock - accquired in pfil_run_hooks and tcbinfo /=20
inp mtxs from tcp_output.  Nothing in the transmission path must use sx=20
locks.  I keep on telling that.

=2D-=20
/"\  Best regards,                      | mlaier@freebsd.org
\ /  Max Laier                          | ICQ #67774661
 X   http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/  | mlaier@EFnet
/ \  ASCII Ribbon Campaign              | Against HTML Mail and News

--nextPart13802235.cdYHEPnHO5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBGvg4ZXyyEoT62BG0RAixeAJwMLKYL5Ogg/Xvcyf/zzq6jAxa0BgCcDys6
aMXgTzCy0sTmRUH0YHaewXw=
=WavR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart13802235.cdYHEPnHO5--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200708112129.29751.max>