Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:22:35 +0200 From: Buki <dev@null.cz> To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Loosing alias IPs Message-ID: <20070824132235.GB378@dev.null.cz> In-Reply-To: <46CED91E.2060602@tomjudge.com> References: <1571172802.401187519463481.JavaMail.root@leda.georgiadis.eu> <alpine.BSF.0.999.0708201032440.15008@qbhto.arg> <20070824124826.GZ378@dev.null.cz> <46CED91E.2060602@tomjudge.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--TtVnplxfhbQQzL6S Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 02:11:58PM +0100, Tom Judge wrote: > Buki wrote: [snip] > > > >Also, aliased Ip addresses must be configured with netmask /32 > > >=20 > This is only true if the IP aliases are in the same network as the first= =20 > IP address. The following would be a valid configuration: >=20 > ifconfig_em0=3D"inet 192.168.0.1/24" > ifconfig_em0_alias0=3D"inet 192.168.0.2/32" > ifconfig_em0_alias1=3D"inet 192.168.1.1/24" > ifconfig_em0_alias2=3D"inet 192.168.1.2/32" yeah, after sending the mail I immediately thought of that scenario, but then again, from the original poster I got the idea the aliases were on the same network as the DHCP-assigned address > Tom Buki --=20 PGP public key: http://dev.null.cz/buki.asc /"\ \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML & Outlook Mail / \ http://www.thebackrow.net --TtVnplxfhbQQzL6S Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGztubPzhIkpLLm08RAhfrAJ0RIjSYBoPOuQIFFtIhtQfbeqOGwwCgsdKL V6RpWRArpBRU4/6KO5aCEyA= =GyEk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TtVnplxfhbQQzL6S--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070824132235.GB378>