Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:58:56 +0200 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: geom label detaching partway through boot Message-ID: <20070911095856.GA1110@garage.freebsd.pl> In-Reply-To: <fc5j7u$ob8$1@sea.gmane.org> References: <op.tyfhhyg61l7iwy@corrugated-real.rochester.rr.com> <20070910084143.GA18587@garage.freebsd.pl> <1131.147.177.179.52.1189445556.squirrel@angst.csh.rit.edu> <20070910175539.GB1103@garage.freebsd.pl> <fc5j7u$ob8$1@sea.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 10:22:12AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: > Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > > >Ah, version is not important actually. The problem is that both > >/dev/da0s1a and /dev/label/geom0s1a have the same size and the same > >metadata. > > Doesn't glabel store it's metadata on the provider (da0) if used with > the "label" verb? If so, why isn't the produced geom (geom0) shorter by > one sector? If not, where does it store the metadata? :) geom0 is one sector shorter than da0, but bsdlabel stuff, which defines partitions is the same for both, so geom0s1a and da0s1a have the same size. -- Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl pjd@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFG5mbgForvXbEpPzQRAq2SAJ4nKQNGfBZrv4l7jNjSmt8lGMYEIwCfR3/r 8tOgD2rNXNlBRk7NT8wyF7Q= =4BqD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070911095856.GA1110>