Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:09:00 +0200 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> To: "rsync.net" <info@rsync.net> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern.ngroups (non) setting ... new bounty ? Message-ID: <20070927110900.GD1193@garage.freebsd.pl> In-Reply-To: <20070925093722.N21960@mail.rsync.net> References: <20070925093722.N21960@mail.rsync.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--mR8QP4gmHujQHb1c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 09:51:06AM -0700, rsync.net wrote: >=20 > It has been impossible to change kern.ngroups - at least for several years > now. It was not fixed in either 5.x or 6.x : >=20 > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/2007-January/022140.html >=20 > It is seemingly a difficult problem: >=20 > http://www.atm.tut.fi/list-archive/freebsd-stable/msg09969.html [1] >=20 > However it should be solved - we can't be the only ones out there trying > to add a UID to more than 16 groups... >=20 >=20 > ----- >=20 >=20 > The rsync.net code bounties have been fairly successful this year - two of > the five projects have been completed, and the large "vmware 6 on FreeBSD" > project is now underway. >=20 > We'd like to add a new bounty for this kern.ngroups issue. We are posting > to -hackers today to get some feedback on how long this will take and how > much money might reasonably be expected to lure this work. >=20 >=20 > --rsync.net Support >=20 >=20 >=20 > [1] Is it indeed true that these programs are broken by not following > NGROUPS_MAX from syslimits.h? I don't see how they can be broken. They may not see more than 16 groups, but they shouldn't blow up. The only possibility of bad usage I see is something like this: gid_t gids[NGROUPS_MAX]; int gidsetlen; gidsetlen =3D getgroups(0, NULL); getgroups(gidsetlen, gids); But I guess the most common use is: gid_t gids[NGROUPS_MAX]; int gidsetlen; gidsetlen =3D getgroups(NGROUPS_MAX, gids); Binaries using the latter method should be just fine. BTW. The latter method is what all utilities from the base system use. --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl pjd@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! --mR8QP4gmHujQHb1c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFG+49MForvXbEpPzQRArKLAJwMvA85vNuEiUlKkFDO2qmbPkrvIgCfQiO2 LMGAyT+FfATQk1YIbG9Jy/w= =j8gH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mR8QP4gmHujQHb1c--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070927110900.GD1193>