Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 07:01:52 -0500 From: freebsd@vfemail.net To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Fwd: Re: Jail not starting Message-ID: <20071022070152.kmru71zyw8ogocog@mail.vfemail.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sorry folks
even though I sent this reply long back, didn't realize that it didn't =20
go to the mailing list until today.
I am still having the same problem, and would appreciate suggestions =20
for further testing.
Best regards
----- Forwarded message from freebsd@vfemail.net -----
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 01:56:07 -0500
From: freebsd@vfemail.net
Reply-To: freebsd@vfemail.net
Subject: Re: Jail not starting
To: Wesley Shields <wxs@atarininja.org>
Quoting Wesley Shields <wxs@atarininja.org>:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 07:12:18AM -0500, freebsd@vfemail.net wrote:
>> Dear all
>> Any suggestion, further diagnosis or request for further info is highly
>> appreciated.
>
> Without knowing what services you have starting in your jail it's hard
> to tell what's causing the delay. Try hitting ^T to see exactly what's
> going on while you are waiting.
>
> -- WXS
>
well, I'm trying to run BIND in one jail and Apache on the other.
first, I tried doing the BIND/named. As you have suggested, I hit the
^T, couple of times, and this is what came up
/etc/rc.d/jail start
Configuring jails:.
Starting jails:load: 0.60 cmd: sh 76309 [runnable] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 1716k
load: 0.72 cmd: sh 77454 [runnable] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 2656k
load: 0.74 cmd: dirname 77929 [runnable] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 340k
load: 0.74 cmd: sh 75636 [runnable] 0.28u 2.31s 9% 3204k
load: 0.74 cmd: dirname 78312 [runnable] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 532k
load: 0.76 cmd: dirname 78415 [runnable] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 344k
load: 0.76 cmd: sh 78506 [runnable] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 3528k
load: 0.76 cmd: dirname 78631 [runnable] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 148k
load: 0.76 cmd: sh 75636 [runnable] 0.32u 3.14s 11% 3696k
load: 0.76 cmd: sh 75636 [runnable] 0.32u 3.26s 11% 3764k
load: 0.76 cmd: dirname 78850 [runnable] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 216k
load: 0.76 cmd: dirname 78898 [runnable] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 148k
load: 0.76 cmd: dirname 78968 [runnable] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 452k
load: 0.78 cmd: sh 79018 [runnable] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 3952k
load: 0.78 cmd: sh 75636 [runnable] 0.37u 3.65s 12% 4000k
load: 0.78 cmd: sh 79165 [runnable] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 4072k
load: 0.78 cmd: sh 75636 [runnable] 0.40u 3.86s 12% 4124k
load: 0.78 cmd: sh 75636 [runnable] 0.44u 4.39s 14% 4408k
load: 0.80 cmd: sh 75636 [runnable] 0.44u 4.53s 14% 4480k
load: 0.80 cmd: dirname 79720 [runnable] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 472k
load: 0.92 cmd: sh 82655 [runnable] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 6952k
to be quite honest, I have no clue what these mean -- the only thing I
can figure out is the load is quite low -- not even 1. and all the
commands are runnable. but what else should I check?
thanks and regards
-------------------------------------------------
This message sent through Virus Free Email
http://www.vfemail.net
----- End forwarded message -----
-------------------------------------------------
This message sent through Virus Free Email
http://www.vfemail.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071022070152.kmru71zyw8ogocog>