Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 20 Dec 2007 21:40:00 +0100
From:      Peter Schuller <peter.schuller@infidyne.com>
To:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, ticso@cicely.de
Cc:        Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: readv: parallel or sequential?
Message-ID:  <200712202140.08367.peter.schuller@infidyne.com>
In-Reply-To: <20071207174914.GQ10459@cicely12.cicely.de>
References:  <fjbb3v$n60$1@ger.gmane.org> <fjbk9g$pua$1@ger.gmane.org> <20071207174914.GQ10459@cicely12.cicely.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1892641.kd1lzOhxf9
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

> Yes, but how can it now that it is on a RAID0 and taking advantage of
> multiple spindles instead of making it worse?
> The FS has to do sensible things for single spindle as well.
> And normaly disks are fastest when reading linear and with disk read
> caches this doesn't even have to be interleaved.
> I don't see any potential for parallell access within the same file
> beside some special constructed cases maybe.

I strongly disagree here. I would expect the operating system to not serial=
ize=20
all I/O to the same file descriptor/file, if done in paralell from multiple=
=20
threads or through AIO. I have at least on use case heavily dependent on=20
this - does this mean FreeBSD would not be usable for this?

Not to mention things like databases (e.g. high concurrency I/O in PostgreS=
QL=20
or whatever). You most definitely want concurrent I/O if supported by the=20
underlying device.

Are we saying here that I/O scheduling happens at a just below the file=20
system, rather than at the individual device level? I would have assumed th=
at=20
a particular geom class would just forward (modified) I/O requests to the=20
underlying device, such that when the request reaches a device actually doi=
ng=20
I/O to some external entity, it can intelligently schedule in a way that is=
=20
optimal.

Or am I misunderstanding something in this discussion?

=2D-=20
/ Peter Schuller

PGP userID: 0xE9758B7D or 'Peter Schuller <peter.schuller@infidyne.com>'
Key retrieval: Send an E-Mail to getpgpkey@scode.org
E-Mail: peter.schuller@infidyne.com Web: http://www.scode.org


--nextPart1892641.kd1lzOhxf9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBHatMoDNor2+l1i30RAr2LAKCD3H/CKuMJn9ylOddOJNkpdfk2fgCgsVz9
PBPccGBzLdAi7ZeRwaEAjv0=
=ZnGO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1892641.kd1lzOhxf9--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200712202140.08367.peter.schuller>