Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:05:29 +0100 From: Timo Schoeler <timo.schoeler@riscworks.net> To: Harti Brandt <harti@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD's problems as seen by the BSDForen.de community Message-ID: <20080111150529.e96a7b1d.timo.schoeler@riscworks.net> In-Reply-To: <20080111145557.C60251@knop-beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> References: <47873B06.9010603@riscworks.net> <200801111058.m0BAwAMG001075@lurza.secnetix.de> <20080111140144.59498431.timo.schoeler@riscworks.net> <47876B39.3040703@FreeBSD.org> <20080111145128.abb76a0a.timo.schoeler@riscworks.net> <20080111145557.C60251@knop-beagle.kn.op.dlr.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Thus Harti Brandt <hartmut.brandt@dlr.de> spake on Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:59:26 +0100 (CET): > On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, Timo Schoeler wrote: > > TS>No, I didn't. I said that the work is done ineffectively as he's > TS>doing underprioritized stuff. Working on higher prioritized stuff > TS>would be more efficient, and would help the project even more. > TS> > TS>Given the assumption that the developer is able to do both, the > TS>Xmas tree as well as importing ZFS v9 into the tree. > TS> > TS>(I don't see the point that when somebody is really *capable* of > TS>doing both things, why should (s)he do the 'lower priority' thing. > TS>If you are at the olympic stadium and you're the best sprinter, > TS>you wouldn't join the marathon...!) > > Sorry, this is just crap. I'm a rather bad guitar player, at least > much worse than I'm a programmer. Yet I enjoy playing Joe Pass at 1/4 > the speed while I could import ZFS during that time ... People just > bring to FreeBSD what they like to do, not what would be the best for > you or others. If you want them to change priorities according to > YOUR needs, pay them money. > > harti Harti, you didn't get the point. You can also lead you dog into my yard, as long as you don't work on FreeBSD noone cares, really. The difference is *when* working on FreeBSD *what* do to -- xmas tree or ZFS. I thought this argumentation was pretty straightforward, but sometimes 2 +2 is really 5... Timo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHh3epUY3eBSqOgOMRCki4AJ9wzhaAb+Qn5Qieb0SH50lT12S9SgCgmWHN Kfl2EzrdbrvyNLg4V4OgYIU= =riKO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080111150529.e96a7b1d.timo.schoeler>