Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 17:51:45 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Bogdan Culibrk <bc@default.co.yu> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some ZFS experience Message-ID: <20080206174915.O4330@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <1202313434.5415.209.camel@serafim> References: <1202313434.5415.209.camel@serafim>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > What happened: > 1. Base system running on gmirror volume consisting of 4 mirrors booted > up normally in degraded mode with 3 of 4 drives online. > 2. /data powered by raidz1 zfs was showing 3 drives, 2 online and 1 > faulted. zfs list was showing that volume is unavailable due lack of > spares. you told about having raidz over 4 drives. so while it reports 2 online and 1 faulted, not 3 online and 1 faulted? > What was wrong when 3 drives were connected? Wasnt supposed to raidz1 > survive lack of 1 drive? Or I did something wrong there? yes it should work normally. in case of raid-z - with just a bit slower speed according to ZFS theory.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080206174915.O4330>