Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:08:35 +0100 From: Nikola =?UTF-8?B?TGXEjWnEhw==?= <nikola.lecic@anthesphoria.net> To: Erich Dollansky <oceanare@pacific.net.sg> Cc: "Heiko Wundram \(Beenic\)" <wundram@beenic.net>, FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: what happened to linuxflashplugin? Message-ID: <20080211210835.23c11096@anthesphoria.net> In-Reply-To: <47B06A39.7090708@pacific.net.sg> References: <47AFC80B.8090303@gmail.com> <47B05924.5000405@cs.okstate.edu> <47B05C7A.80602@pacific.net.sg> <200802111540.34420.wundram@beenic.net> <20080211161507.6e82fbd4@anthesphoria.net> <47B06A39.7090708@pacific.net.sg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:31:05 +0800 Erich Dollansky <oceanare@pacific.net.sg> wrote: > Nikola Lečić wrote: [...] > > Agree here, but "open-source friendly" companies that promote the > > use of flash are much worse. As it seems to be, the reason why > > people want to use flash on FreeBSD is youtube in most of cases. > > YouTube? Isn't the right spelling YouPorn? No, it isn't. If you find nothing worth watching on *You*Tube, it doesn't mean that others can't find interesting things. For example, I find there a lot of good and difficult-to-find material from some fields of art. (Can anybody comment on my questions regarding Wine and Linux compatibility layer...?) - -- Nikola Lečić = Никола Лечић fingerprint : FEF3 66AF C90E EDC3 D878 7CDC 956D F4AB A377 1C9B ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iQCVAwUBR7CrUPzDP9K2CKGYAQPcigP/eQxtAKsCPdoQxnNxbj7ho5XZFbpzgkcJ B0jov5NBs7EPzaxWA7W5qM60MM7K6uPTkil1TbRnkaanH5JTiir04RbwaqNo1NBl 8ZtVaKp50UgBzDhKctYk5PRhDAP4+CTtGzCyzQ7z5H3R2dHVzh3ZiC/vTFGvL6w1 qq4yzpqbAe8= =OitZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080211210835.23c11096>