Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:49:38 +0100 From: Mel <fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: =?iso-8859-1?q?M=E4chler_Philippe?= <pmaechler@glattnet.ch> Subject: Re: ARP Messages Message-ID: <200802261549.39342.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> In-Reply-To: <47C42561.5000005@locolomo.org> References: <006601c87871$186e79b0$3202a8c0@glattwerk.local> <200802261541.03781.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <47C42561.5000005@locolomo.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 26 February 2008 15:42:41 Erik Norgaard wrote:
> Mel wrote:
> > On Tuesday 26 February 2008 13:14:11 Mächler Philippe wrote:
> >> %netstat -rn
> >> Routing tables
> >>
> >> Internet:
> >> Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use
> >> Netif Expire
> >>
> >> 192.168.2 192.168.3.254 UGS 0 8209
> >> bge1
> >> 192.168.3 link#2 UC 0 0
> >> bge1
> >
> > These routes look fishy. It shouldn't have a route for 192.168.2 cause
> > it's nowhere defined, so it should go through default, not through bge1.
> > Any chance a machine on your network has 192.168.2/24 and publishing it,
> > where it should be 80.242 something?
> > Try route delete 192.168.2.0 and see if it clears.
>
> This part is ok if you see the schema in OPs later mail.
Really? Where do you see 192.168.TWO instead of 192.168.THREE?
--
Mel
Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules
and never get to the software part.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200802261549.39342.fbsd.questions>