Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 15:33:00 -0500 From: Wesley Shields <wxs@FreeBSD.org> To: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: interactive ports - the plague Message-ID: <20080303203300.GD68644@atarininja.org> In-Reply-To: <924DE1DC-B8AD-4557-AAD2-E5C31F77E09A@khera.org> References: <47CBC3C5.9050007@bsdforen.de> <20080303155354.2043d131@gumby.homeunix.com.> <47CC26F3.7020709@cyberbotx.com> <20080303170457.02959c09@gumby.homeunix.com.> <20080303172750.GB65151@atarininja.org> <924DE1DC-B8AD-4557-AAD2-E5C31F77E09A@khera.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 03:01:00PM -0500, Vivek Khera wrote: > > On Mar 3, 2008, at 12:27 PM, Wesley Shields wrote: > >> I know mail/postfix asks if it should activate itself in >> /etc/mail/mailer.conf. > > I'll take that as a bug report :-) I didn't intend for that to be a bug report. :) > Though I'm not sure which way it should default, on BATCH. And does BATCH > apply to package install as well? Honestly, I have not put much thought into it. I was just pointing out that some ports require post-installation questions to be answered. Thanks for your work on postfix, it's always just worked for me. -- WXS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080303203300.GD68644>