Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 20:17:51 +0100 From: Torfinn Ingolfsen <torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: INET6 -- and why I don't use it Message-ID: <20080309201751.5d77e2b6.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> In-Reply-To: <200803091714.m29HEYBc077132@lurza.secnetix.de> References: <20080306230625.5c6df098.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> <200803091714.m29HEYBc077132@lurza.secnetix.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 18:14:34 +0100 (CET) Oliver Fromme <olli@lurza.secnetix.de> wrote: > Why use dyndns.org? Your IPv6 address isn't dynamic. You are correct, of course. It shows that l I haven't got my head around the whole ipv6 issue, right? > My home ISP doesn't support native IPv6 yet (though they > say they're working on it), but they host a SixXS node, > so I registered with sixxs.org. (Everybody can register > with them, even if your ISP doesn't have its own node.) > Once you have registered, you can request a tunnel, and > then you can get a static /64 subnet assigned, including > reverse DNS delegation. Works fine for me. I wonder: does this tunnel thing work even if you have a dynamic ip on the public side of your broadband modem / router? I my case, my FreeBSD gateway and firewall sits behind the broadband router, and have private ip's on both interaces (internal and external). Do I need a public ip on my gateway in order to use a tunnel? -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080309201751.5d77e2b6.torfinn.ingolfsen>