Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 10:12:35 -0500 From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> Cc: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net>, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux_dri at amd64 (was: Re: What is the recommended LinuxEmulator and kernel that will run skype-devel and maybe Flash9) Message-ID: <20080316151235.GA19467@soaustin.net> In-Reply-To: <19543989_-_@ipt.ru> References: <20080315080424.13561oymhrersh8g@intranet.encontacto.net> <40994934@ipt.ru> <20080316095023.4a64aecd@deskjail> <200803160129.21065.beech@freebsd.org> <19543989_-_@ipt.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 04:28:42PM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: > Seems that the case is not so strict: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/91318 OK, the email thread that led to the current state of this PR is what I am remembering, under the vague label of "we will need someone to track this when we flip it over". It will be instructive to look at the graphics/linux_dri row in http://portsmon.freebsd.org/chartsandgraphs/package_failures_list.amd64-6.html. I'm not objecting to flipping the ARCH as long as someone takes a look at the dependents and does TRT with them. It sounds like we already have volunteers :-) mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080316151235.GA19467>