Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 15:01:43 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Beech Rintoul <beech@freebsd.org> Cc: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux_dri at amd64 (was: Re: What is the recommended LinuxEmulator and kernel that will run skype-devel and maybe Flash9) Message-ID: <20080317150143.nvalwznv9c08kows@webmail.leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <200803161412.05267.beech@freebsd.org> References: <20080315080424.13561oymhrersh8g@intranet.encontacto.net> <19543989_-_@ipt.ru> <20080316151235.GA19467@soaustin.net> <200803161412.05267.beech@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Beech Rintoul <beech@freebsd.org> (from Sun, 16 Mar 2008 =20 13:11:59 -0900): > On Sunday 16 March 2008, Mark Linimon said: >> On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 04:28:42PM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: >> > Seems that the case is not so strict: >> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/91318 >> >> OK, the email thread that led to the current state of this PR is >> what I am remembering, under the vague label of "we will need >> someone to track this when we flip it over". >> >> It will be instructive to look at the graphics/linux_dri row in >> http://portsmon.freebsd.org/chartsandgraphs/package_failures_list.a >> md64-6.html. >> >> I'm not objecting to flipping the ARCH as long as someone takes a >> look at the dependents and does TRT with them. It sounds like we >> already have volunteers :-) >> >> mcl > > In going through the depend list, and grepping the tree it looks to me > like there are @20 ports affected, one of which is marked broken for > other reasons and two which are mine. Unless there's ports which > aren't already flagged, I don't see any serious breakage happening. > > Alexander mentioned to check for linux errors. dyeske has been stress > testing skype and there are none. So what's next? Maybe a heads-up on > ports@ and I'm willing to ping the individual maintainers and track > any breakage. > > BTW, I posted a list of dependent ports on my wiki: Ok, as they are already i386 only, I don't expect a major impact by =20 just switching linux_dri. To be on the safe side, just have a look =20 again if no other port depends upon linux_dri and is marked as amd64 =20 too. Bye, Alexander. --=20 Avoid reality at all costs. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID =3D 72077137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080317150143.nvalwznv9c08kows>