Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:41:59 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Da Rock <rock_on_the_web@comcen.com.au> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCSI network Message-ID: <20080331164038.T2059@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <1206940957.30698.11.camel@laptop2.herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <20080329131542.H80112@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080331033417.GH28690@dan.emsphone.com> <1206940957.30698.11.camel@laptop2.herveybayaustralia.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> unmanaged switch will work much better :) >> > > I'd agree with that 100%- do the bandwidth math (not to mention the ease > of setup): gigabit each way compared to a max of 320mb (I could be wrong > on the exact figures, but the gigabit is still faster). > 320MB is 2560Mb not 320Mb 160MB/s is above gigabit ethernet speed - half duplex, but when traffic goes mostly one direction - it's not a problem. > Setup a small private network between the machines in question and > everything would be happy. of course - but just asked as i have a bunch of unused U160 controllers and cables.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080331164038.T2059>