Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 13:25:43 +0200 From: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> To: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: [RFC]: a place for [f]truncate64 Message-ID: <20080423112543.GA20954@freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline hi, Linux defines two syscalls ftruncate64 and truncate64 that are defined only on 32bit archs, currently Linuxulator implementes ftruncate64 which is defined in linux[32]_machdep.c, ie. in machine dependant file. I plan to commit truncate64 but I prefer it to be placed in linux_file.c which is machine independent. Kostik and I had a discussion about this yesterday and we didnt agree what is the best place for these functions. I think it's better to have it in linux_file.c because the only problem that can arise is that on platforms that don't use these syscalls there will be unused function in linux_file.c Kostik prefers each linux[32]_machdep.c to have it's own copy. So I ask emulation@ what should be done, do we want this in linux_file.c or linux[32]_machdep.c thnx roman --tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkgPHLcACgkQLVEj6D3CBEwtmgCeKjpw8HeTWYAutV3Bvsh8q08T vIsAniYG89C6QOqKh9vj9A5B5ZgyY1to =1Z8U -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080423112543.GA20954>