Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 08:51:12 +0200 (CEST) From: Harti Brandt <hartmut.brandt@dlr.de> To: Michael Proto <mike@jellydonut.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> Subject: Re: bsnmpd hrProcessorLoad results incorrect on FreeBSD 7 or 8? Message-ID: <20080507085035.L9490@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> In-Reply-To: <482121B1.7080901@jellydonut.org> References: <4820FE0F.9050808@jellydonut.org> <200805070149.m471nToM073813@lava.sentex.ca> <482121B1.7080901@jellydonut.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 6 May 2008, Michael Proto wrote: MP>Mike Tancsa wrote: MP>> At 08:55 PM 5/6/2008, Michael Proto wrote: MP>> > Is anyone seeing problems with bsnmpd reporting an incorrect MP>> > HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrProcessorLoad value under HEAD? I'm using the MP>> > default /etc/snmpd.config settings and am loading the MP>> > /usr/lib/snmp_hostres.so library just as I do in 6.3, but the value for MP>> > this MIB always reports CPU utilization at 100% regardless of the actual MP>> > load on the system. 6.3 and 6-STABLE both work correctly and report the MP>> > actual CPU utilization when queried. MP>> MP>> IIRC, I noticed this when I changed to ULE from 4BSD_SCHED. MP>> MP>> ---Mike MP>> _______________________________________________ MP>> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list MP>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current MP>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" MP> MP>Would match my environment as well, as I'm using ULE on all of the MP>affected systems. Just built a 4BSD kernel on my HEAD system and MP>HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrProcessorLoad reports a correct value again. MP> MP>Anyone have an idea on a fix? If anybody has a fix that works with both schedulers, I happily commit this. harti
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080507085035.L9490>