Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 18:56:59 +0200 From: "Alexey Shuvaev" <shuvaev@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Gnome reference framework bsd.gnome-reference.mk VS [NO]PORTDOCS Message-ID: <20080521165659.GA8375@wep4017.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello list! I am working on update to x11-toolkits/gtkdatabox2 and it has recently got an html reference (built using gtk-doc). The gtkdatabox2 is a rather rarely used port and its reference consists of app. 25 files (for now). What is better, - to create separate gtkdatabox-reference port, or - to intstall documentation from the existing port, under the control of NOPORTDOCS variable? The second question is about bsd.gnome-reference.mk framework discussed recently[1]. Althoug gtkdatabox is not an official part of gnome, it uses the same structure and therefore could be handled in the same way as other "official" gnome components. Are there any reasons to use one of: - devel/glib20-reference/bsd.gnome-reference.mk framework - handling docs on one's own? Thanks, Alexey. 1. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2008-May/048645.html http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2008-May/048647.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080521165659.GA8375>