Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:16:15 +1000 From: Andrew Reilly <areilly@bigpond.net.au> To: pav@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/118808: Fix to build ports/lang/drscheme on FreeBSD-7.0 Message-ID: <20080619031615.GA86175@duncan.reilly.home> In-Reply-To: <200806190250.m5J2ot0W097615@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200806190250.m5J2ot0W097615@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Pav, On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 02:50:55AM +0000, pav@FreeBSD.org wrote: > Synopsis: Fix to build ports/lang/drscheme on FreeBSD-7.0 > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: pav > State-Changed-When: Thu Jun 19 02:50:30 UTC 2008 > State-Changed-Why: > Committed, thanks! > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=118808 I'm not sure that these patches are still necessary. As far as I know, they've been accepted up-stream at least for version 372. I've been running the 4.0 precursors for a while, so I haven't checked this myself. Regarding 4.0, which has just been relased, I sent a new port for consideration to jkoshy a couple of days ago, but hadn't noticed that he's not the official maintainer any more. Should I attach it to a send-pr, or send it to someone particular instead? I opted to make it a new port (called plt-scheme, rather than drscheme) because it is not backwards compatible in some ways, and because the version number got smaller 4.0, rather than 400, and because that's what the PLT group themselves seem to be calling it, now. Cheers, Andrew
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080619031615.GA86175>