Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:39:15 +0900 (JST) From: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> To: shino@fornext.org Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, hrs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/125003: incorrect EtherIP header format. Message-ID: <20080626.173915.115767618.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200806260820.m5Q8K40p017875@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200806260820.m5Q8K40p017875@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----Security_Multipart(Thu_Jun_26_17_39_15_2008_322)--
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Shunsuke SHINOMIYA <shino@fornext.org> wrote
in <200806260820.m5Q8K40p017875@freefall.freebsd.org>:
sh> But, EtherIP is implemented as follows.
sh>
sh> struct etherip_header {
sh> u_int8_t eip_ver; /* version/reserved */
sh> u_int8_t eip_pad; /* required padding byte */
sh> };
sh>
sh> By this one, FreeBSD box has no interoperability against other EtherIP
sh> implementations.
I do not think our current implementation has interoperability issue
here because eip_ver is always used with ETHER_IP_VER_*_MASK. Could
you please elaborate more specific case?
--
| Hiroki SATO
----Security_Multipart(Thu_Jun_26_17_39_15_2008_322)--
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD)
iEYEABECAAYFAkhjVbMACgkQTyzT2CeTzy2OlACgl5YTUubtrkYxGPBbzxJh/j4Z
QoUAmwQkdFDRIsMC1rFbalswarcI/Ps0
=oM9s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
----Security_Multipart(Thu_Jun_26_17_39_15_2008_322)----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080626.173915.115767618.hrs>