Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:01:03 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Michael Powell <nightrecon@verizon.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: to scsi or not to scsi Message-ID: <20080627135934.U3211@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <g42jmq$8ec$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <20080626092558.1a17d7d2@gom.home> <4863E58C.2060602@webrz.net> <g42jmq$8ec$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The concept that SATA subsystems will tend to consume more CPU cycles because SCSI controllers untrue. SATA disk consumes really small amount of CPU under FreeBSD. even if it's less than on SCSI controller it is still very little.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080627135934.U3211>