Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 09:38:07 +0200 From: Henrik Brix Andersen <brix@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Curious about SCM choice Message-ID: <20080628073807.GB45690@tirith.brixandersen.dk> In-Reply-To: <1E7FB809-CFBE-4ED6-9F32-97C90359BBF9@cyberlifelabs.com> References: <E2C84A13-15E7-4BFE-B44F-A4C27966188C@cyberlifelabs.com> <4e571dd70806271037j59faed19y8d3e29423c9d8a2@mail.gmail.com> <1E7FB809-CFBE-4ED6-9F32-97C90359BBF9@cyberlifelabs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--JYK4vJDZwFMowpUq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 06:26:54PM -0700, Milo Hyson wrote: > Can not the "decentralized" systems like Mercurial and GIT be used in a= =20 > centralized fashion? Our internal experiments certainly show them to be= =20 > every bit as capable as Subversion in this regard. Has your experience be= en=20 > different? They _can_ be used in centralized fashion, but they do not enforce it. Subversion enforces a centralized development model. Brix --=20 Henrik Brix Andersen <brix@FreeBSD.org> --JYK4vJDZwFMowpUq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) Comment: GnuPG signed iEYEARECAAYFAkhl6l8ACgkQv+Q4flTiePi8EwCfce5cJSdMu6H6LIk6vgWHI5Ve 5TQAoKuD/UsWjDZ4exBLmjt6jKl5oVzp =x11B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JYK4vJDZwFMowpUq--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080628073807.GB45690>