Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 05:15:38 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> To: Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>, Bart Van Kerckhove <bart@it-ss.be>, Ingo Flaschberger <if@xip.at>, Paul <paul@gtcomm.net> Subject: Re: Freebsd IP Forwarding performance (question, and some info) [7-stable, current, em, smp] Message-ID: <20080708045135.V1022@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20080708034304.R21502@delplex.bde.org> References: <4867420D.7090406@gtcomm.net> <4869B025.9080006@gtcomm.net><486A7E45.3030902@gtcomm.net> <486A8F24.5010000@gtcomm.net><486A9A0E.6060308@elischer.org> <486B41D5.3060609@gtcomm.net><alpine.LFD.1.10.0807021052041.557@filebunker.xip.at><486B4F11.6040906@gtcomm.net><alpine.LFD.1.10.0807021155280.557@filebunker.xip.at><486BC7F5.5070604@gtcomm.net><20080703160540.W6369@delplex.bde.org><486C7F93.7010308@gtcomm.net><20080703195521.O6973@delplex.bde.org><486D35A0.4000302@gtcomm.net><alpine.LFD.1.10.0807041106591.19613@filebunker.xip.at><486DF1A3.9000409@gtcomm.net><alpine.LFD.1.10.0807041303490.20760@filebunker.xip.at><486E65E6.3060301@gtcomm.net> <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807052356130.2145@filebunker.xip.at> <2d3001c8def1$f4309b90$020b000a@bartwrkstxp> <486FFF70.3090402@gtcomm.net> <48701921.7090107@gtcomm.net> <4871E618.1080500@freebsd.org> <20080708002228.G680@besplex.bde.org> <48724238.2020103@freebsd.org> <20080708034304.R21502@delplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>
>> Bruce Evans wrote:
>>> So it seems that the major overheads are not near the driver (as I already
>>> knew), and upper layers are responsible for most of the cache misses.
>>> The packet header is accessed even in monitor mode, so I think most of
>>> the cache misses in upper layers are not related to the packet header.
>>> Maybe they are due mainly to perfect non-locality for mbufs.
>>
>> Monitor mode doesn't access the payload packet header. It only looks
>> at the mbuf (which has a structure called mbuf packet header). The mbuf
>> header it hot in the cache because the driver just touched it and filled
>> in the information. The packet content (the payload) is cold and just
>> arrived via DMA in DRAM.
>
> Why does it use ntohs() then? :-). From if_ethersubr.c:
> ...
> % eh = mtod(m, struct ether_header *);
>
> Point outside of mbuf header.
>
> % etype = ntohs(eh->ether_type);
>
> First access outside of mbuf header.
> ...
> % % /* Allow monitor mode to claim this frame, after stats are updated.
> */
> % if (ifp->if_flags & IFF_MONITOR) {
> % m_freem(m);
> % return;
> % }
>
> Finally return in monitor mode.
>
> I don't see any stats update before here except for the stray if_imcasts
> one.
There are some error stats with printfs, but I've never seen these do
anything except with a buggy sk driver.
Testing verifies that accessing eh above gives a cache miss. Under
~5.2 receiving on bge0 at 397 kpps:
-monitor: 17% idle 19 cm/p (18% less idle than under -current)
monitor: 66% idle 8 cm/p (17% less idle than under -current)
+monitor: 71% idle 7 cm/p (idle time under -current not measured)
+monitor is monitor mode with the exit moved to the top of ether_input().
If the cache miss takes the time measured by lmbench2 (42 ns), then
397 k of these per second gives 17 ms or 1.7% CPU, which is vaguely
consistent with the improvement of 5% by not taking this cache miss.
Avoiding most of the 19 cache misses should give much more than a
5% improvement. Maybe -current gets its 17% improvement by avoiding
some.
More userland stats weirdness in userland:
- in monitor mode, em0 gives byte counts delayed while bge0 gives byte
counts always 0.
- netstat -I <interface> 1 seems to be broken in ~5.2 in all modes -- it
gives output for interfaces with drivers but no hardware.
All this is for UP. An SMP kernel on the same UP system loses < 5% for at
least tx.
Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080708045135.V1022>
