Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 20:04:25 +0200 From: Mel <fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: kalin m <mail@godfur.com>, Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> Subject: Re: ports Message-ID: <200807082004.25873.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> In-Reply-To: <48739EB6.4040909@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <4873927E.3050307@godfur.com> <44ej64s4e7.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <48739EB6.4040909@infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 19:07:02 Matthew Seaman wrote:
> You can configure named to always send packets using a
> fixed port number (which can be helpful for firewalling)
Purely outof interest, which (useful) firewall/nat rules cannot be made with
dest port 53, that can be made with source port 53. Not talking syntax,
but "business logically".
--
Mel
Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules
and never get to the software part.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200807082004.25873.fbsd.questions>