Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 20:11:23 +0200 From: Mel <fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Vincent Barus <vibarus@googlemail.com> Subject: Re: difference between loading kernel module during boot and after boot manually? Message-ID: <200807082011.23341.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> In-Reply-To: <e4207650807080748o47b5cc8akd53672305cbd63f6@mail.gmail.com> References: <e4207650806221429y4e9c01d2i6d082bbad8a54c54@mail.gmail.com> <e4207650807080748o47b5cc8akd53672305cbd63f6@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 16:48:26 Vincent Barus wrote:
> does anyone have an idea what's the difference or what _could_ be the
> difference on loading a kernel module during boot or manually?
There's one major difference. File systems aren't mounted at loader stage, so
any reference to modules/libraries that exist on a different partition, will
fail.
--
Mel
Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules
and never get to the software part.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200807082011.23341.fbsd.questions>