Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 08:18:58 +0200 From: Koen Martens <fbsd@metro.cx> To: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: portupgrade to Perl 5.10.0 ?? Message-ID: <20080712061857.GA11590@latitude.dh.sono> In-Reply-To: <84B7D49E-038C-4AEB-A7E8-95135698C4F0@khera.org> References: <200807100340.38399.david@vizion2000.net> <200807110919.50885.david@vizion2000.net> <18551.34465.624986.569002@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <200807111138.36884.david@vizion2000.net> <4877AC3E.3050800@FreeBSD.org> <84B7D49E-038C-4AEB-A7E8-95135698C4F0@khera.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 03:06:57PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote: > Seriously, though... is someone actively working on a perl 5.10 port and > can we find out what is holding it up for over 6 months now? Around > February I started wondering about it, but it wasn't such a big deal to me > then. Now it is becoming more of a big deal because our developers want to > start using some of the 5.10 features in our new projects, but without a > port/package it complicates our dev and production environment management. Silly suggestion: if your business is depending on it, either fix the port yourself or pay someone to fix it for you. Seriously, making demands in a free software project is silly (if not rude). Or else, ask your money back.. Gr, Koen - -- K.F.J. Martens, Sonologic, http://www.sonologic.nl/ Databases, wiki-expertise, hosting, server- en infrabeheer. Public PGP key: http://www.metro.cx/pubkey-gmc.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIeEzRktDgRrkFPpYRAhthAKDDfFFucreQYdwu6pnsejYALaWLCQCeMMBw yyeXjruokNES/sS2G5UGjOE= =wYIz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080712061857.GA11590>