Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 11:23:37 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> To: "Carlos A. M. dos Santos" <unixmania@gmail.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, nork@freebsd.org, jahnke@sonatabio.com Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: linuxpluginwrapper-20051113_8 Message-ID: <20080913012337.GP15376@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <e71790db0809121800g6a83c49w6442dca48548ab53@mail.gmail.com> References: <1221264777.5721.596.camel@pinot> <e71790db0809121800g6a83c49w6442dca48548ab53@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--oJAv8lSwuaQsYd0G Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2008-Sep-12 22:00:49 -0300, "Carlos A. M. dos Santos" <unixmania@gmail.c= om> wrote: >I think www/nspluginwrapper is the best choice these days, since >linuxpluginwrapper seems to be an abandoned project. Unfortunately, nspluginwrapper is not a general replacement for linuxpluginwrapper - it is missing most of linuxpluginwrapper's functionality. nork@ also appears to be MIA - he hasn't responded to any of the other threads on linuxpluginwrapper being broken. For my specific requirements (running pips), I managed to hack a work-around but I don't believe it's committable. --=20 Peter Jeremy Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour. --oJAv8lSwuaQsYd0G Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkjLFhkACgkQ/opHv/APuIdQDgCgr1aCV5BRSBjDcHlOilXfJfRT wNMAoJMZkVlj8OaXUxFNN6auy770RbnH =Hw9V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oJAv8lSwuaQsYd0G--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080913012337.GP15376>