Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 25 Sep 2008 00:10:39 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de>
To:        datahead4@gmail.com
Cc:        freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject:   Re: qemu svn r5281 on FreeBSD - slow usb, vmwarevga, screen updates... (now updated to r5313)
Message-ID:  <200809242210.m8OMAcSZ021572@saturn.kn-bremen.de>
In-Reply-To: <cd6b4a5b0809230639x27e94477k315796c2cfb650f2@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20080921204025.GA81055@saturn.kn-bremen.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <cd6b4a5b0809230639x27e94477k315796c2cfb650f2@mail.gmail.com> you write:
>On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de> wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>>  I've been playing with qemu svn on FreeBSD again (new experimental
>> emulators/qemu-devel port update here:
>>        http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/qemu/qemu-devel-20080921.patch
>> ), and want to note a few things:
>
>Hi.  I've built an updated port with your patch and it compiles fine
>and runs my WinXP guests well.  But, the qemu process consumes 100% of
>one CPU core on the host the whole time it is running, regardless of
>what the guest is doing.  The host is a 7-STABLE box from 8/19.  The
>guests run with bridged networking and full kernel kqemu accel
>enabled.
>
Hmm.  And you didn't see this with the version in ports?  Have you
checked if this is related to kqemu? (try without -kernel-kqemu and
also with -no-kqemu.)  Also, which threading libs and scheduler are you
using?  There seems to be an issue with kse, tho I doubt you are using
that on 7-stable...

 Here is another experimental update that forces -lthr on 6.x, and
also updates to qemu svn r5313:
	http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/qemu/qemu-devel-20080924.patch

>Thank you for the continued work on this port!

 You're welcome! :)
	Juergen



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200809242210.m8OMAcSZ021572>