Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 07:18:14 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ZFS patches. Message-ID: <20081031201814.GA54286@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20080829074738.GB3026@garage.freebsd.pl> References: <20080727125413.GG1345@garage.freebsd.pl> <86tzd490qx.fsf@gmail.com> <20080829074738.GB3026@garage.freebsd.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Pawel, On 2008-Aug-28 20:47:30 +0000, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 03:29:58AM +0400, swell.k@gmail.com wrote: >> (CC'ing Attilio, who made the commits) >>=20 >> Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> writes: >>=20 >> > Hi. >> > >> > http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20080727.patch.bz2 >> > >> > The patch above contains the most recent ZFS version that could be fou= nd >> > in OpenSolaris as of today. Apart for large amount of new functionalit= y, >> > I belive there are many stability (and also performance) improvements >> > compared to the version from the base system. >> [...] >>=20 >> After r182371 and r182383 there are another three rejections. Namely >> cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libzpool/common/sys/zfs_context.h.rej >> sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/vdev_file.c.rej >> sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_replay.c.rej >> I'm attaching them in case someone has a quick fix or idea how >> to solve them, especially regarding `+' lines. >>=20 >> In the meantime I'm reverting them locally hoping it will not do any >> harm to me. If this fails then I will stay with r182370 since I already >> upgraded my pools to 11th version and can't go back easily. > >There are some rejections, I know, and I'm tracking everything in >perforce. In the meantime there were two ZFS version bumps in >OpenSOlaris (so I've 13 in perforce at the moment). I probably won't >create new patch, but just commit what I've to HEAD. In the meantime >also I fixes quite a few bugs, mostly reported by kris@. It's now somewhat over two months later and the latest ZFS patchset still appears to be zfs_20080727.patch.bz2. Unfortunately, these patches no longer apply to -current (I tried working through the rejects but must have missed something because I wound up with an unkillable running process). Can you please give us an indication as to when we might expect to see either an updated set of ZFS patches (or, better, the patches committed to -current). --=20 Peter Jeremy Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour. --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkkLaAYACgkQ/opHv/APuIcqcQCeOIcBtNvpNjFJvDDn3Gh8xZEL I8sAoJ7JPIdL1pdaahcb4bO/i1dX7WSF =qouH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081031201814.GA54286>