Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 05:43:49 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> To: Dan <dan-freebsd-fs@ourbrains.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Will XFS be adopted Message-ID: <20081109184349.GG51239@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20081109174303.GA5146@ourbrains.org> References: <20081109174303.GA5146@ourbrains.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On 2008-Nov-09 12:43:03 -0500, Dan <dan-freebsd-fs@ourbrains.org> wrote: >With XFS being adopted by Linux now for a number of years, I wonder why >it hasn't been by FreeBSD. I guess no-one has been sufficiently motivated. > It's a great FS that can be resized on the >fly which makes it a perfect journaling FS with volume managers. FreeBSD has ZFS - which is a re-sizable FS with an integrated volume manager. -- Peter Jeremy Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkkXL2UACgkQ/opHv/APuIf5PQCfVeOcsuqnThBMarFk8ibWpNsU nIYAoKmViMsG99h5VUfK/mwIIKT6uPfx =jaQI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081109184349.GG51239>