Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 06:45:51 +1100 From: John Marshall <john.marshall@riverwillow.com.au> To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Proposal: mechanism for local patches Message-ID: <20081202194551.GC45319@rwpc12.mby.riverwillow.net.au> In-Reply-To: <20081202180743.GB70240@hades.panopticon> References: <gh1l3n$22rv$1@hairball.ziemba.us> <20081202180743.GB70240@hades.panopticon>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 02 Dec 2008, 21:07 +0300, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> I think the most convenient way of implementing this is having
> a directory hierarchy (either two level ${CATEGORY}/${PORTNAME}/patch-*)
> or single level ${PORTNAME}/patch-*) and a single variable that makes
> port system look there for patches in addition to ${PATCHDIR}.
Or keep local patches under /var/db/ports/<port> rather than building a
new tree?
--
John Marshall
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081202194551.GC45319>