Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 23:13:49 +0100 From: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> To: Arjan van der Velde <noresult@xs4all.nl> Cc: FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: TCSBRK not implemented in linux compat Message-ID: <20081202221349.GT64969@hoeg.nl> In-Reply-To: <54A75E03-AE64-4DD9-8D15-7A7499E73D43@xs4all.nl> References: <54A75E03-AE64-4DD9-8D15-7A7499E73D43@xs4all.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--3a/Z8KDuKqDOIvAo
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello Arjan,
* Arjan van der Velde <noresult@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> While trying to get a linux binary running on FreeBSD I encountered the=
=20
> following problem during serial port I/O.
>
> Dec 1 22:22:34 soekris kernel: linux: pid 7239 (linuxbinary): ioctl =20
> fd=3D0, cmd=3D0x5409 ('T',9) is not implemented
>
> 0x5409 turns out to be TCSBRK, which is not implemented (yet?). Can =20
> anyone give me some clues where / how to start implementing this? It =20
> seems like the linux way of handling it is to call tcdrain(), but I'm =20
> not sure as to how this translates to the FreeBSD compat layer.
I think you could just make it call TIOCDRAIN directly. Unfortunately
that's not correct if the argument is 0, because then we have to call
TIOCSBRK and TIOCCBRK with a 250 msec interval. I guess adding some kind
of printf() there should be good enough for now.
I can't look into it right now, because I have to get up at 6:15
tomorrow. Sorry! :-/
--=20
Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>
WWW: http://80386.nl/
--3a/Z8KDuKqDOIvAo
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD)
iEYEARECAAYFAkk1sx0ACgkQ52SDGA2eCwX3rgCeMSbiBpZmzb0E6354tdD1dUlf
BhQAnicrS/svQDk/Gp2muraPDS7WlZ04
=o/mh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--3a/Z8KDuKqDOIvAo--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081202221349.GT64969>