Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:05:20 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors Message-ID: <20081212120437.B3687@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20081212015814.GB32982@kokopelli.hydra> References: <20081207193517.GA20905@laverenz.de> <20081207121431.5dcb37f9@gom.home> <1228733482.4495.14.camel@laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20081211103742.21621a6d@gom.home> <20081211190951.GB845@comcast.net> <20081211113257.405a082c@gom.home> <20081211202023.GC845@comcast.net> <20081211134622.15c81ecd@gom.home> <20081212002813.GD32300@kokopelli.hydra> <20081211170011.777236f8@gom.home> <20081212015814.GB32982@kokopelli.hydra>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > So . . . are you saying that increased support for 3D accelerated > graphics is not an "improvement", and should therefore not be considered > a worthy goal? full support of open hardware standards is an requirement. support for closed hardware standards isn't important.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081212120437.B3687>