Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:31:13 -0500 From: Dan <dan-freebsd-questions@ourbrains.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Centralized DB of "system" users Message-ID: <20081218193113.GA8652@ourbrains.org> In-Reply-To: <49443793.9030404@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <ghtdp3$g0r$1@ger.gmane.org> <20081212120557.V3687@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <9bbcef730812120426t3c4b8a28q337c8379cd947702@mail.gmail.com> <20081212141156.E4001@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <139b44430812120527w7b22d8a1m860cbf308e4b67c3@mail.gmail.com> <ghtq19$o1f$1@ger.gmane.org> <64b284310812120645m6c5ee122mb0510014343eff3f@mail.gmail.com> <49442D1B.4000608@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20081213225041.P44804@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <49443793.9030404@infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthew Seaman(m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk)@2008.12.13 22:30:43 +0000: > Sure LDAP is complicated, but it's of the same order of complexity as a > RDBMS system like MySQL. And like MySQL, there are right times, places > and ways to use it, and wrong ones too. Yes, there is a lot of complexit= y, > but that means there's a lot of flexibility too. > Cheers, > > Matthew I can't disagree more. LDAP is way simpler than any SQL database, even SQLite. That said because people are not familiar/don't grock the simplicity of LDAP, they decide to use SQL databases (partly because everyone else does). Now that we have had LDAP for so many years, insisting on using SQL for authentication/authorization and directory services is just not wise. This is similar to using Apache/PHP/MySQL by default when other, simpler/better options are available. "Everyone=20 else does LAMP, so will I."
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081218193113.GA8652>