Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:28:33 -0500 From: Jerry <gesbbb@yahoo.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Force use of 'gpg2' Message-ID: <20090203142833.65a72eae@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <b79ecaef0902031103w43558a1ej5b2c22c7550f64d9@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090203122406.1732b3f0@scorpio> <b79ecaef0902031103w43558a1ej5b2c22c7550f64d9@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/71UjyCNI2pOZrjTp2J+2Ja3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 19:03:01 +0000 Chris Rees <utisoft@googlemail.com> wrote: [snip] >Try putting the link in somewhere that gets searched before >/usr/local/bin, like /bin or (better) /usr/bin. Then try rehash && >which gpg I am using 'bash' so I don't think 'rehash' is going to do anything, although I could be mistaken. However, I don't see how that would stop a port from installing 'gpg' rather than 'gpg2'. I don't need both versions installed and would rather just keep the newer 'gpg2' one. --=20 Jerry gesbbb@yahoo.com One of the lessons of history is that nothing is often a good thing to do and always a clever thing to say. Will Durant --Sig_/71UjyCNI2pOZrjTp2J+2Ja3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkmImusACgkQBvaKIJWWCO1wHQCfaBkgxkrB9bDJRgSMFpwkMRv4 RWoAninBn4G+2IK0aw++p5nxL8lR1rer =0b9e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/71UjyCNI2pOZrjTp2J+2Ja3--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090203142833.65a72eae>