Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:24:18 +0100 From: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> To: perryh@pluto.rain.com Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, christoph.mallon@gmx.de Subject: Re: hosted, or not (Re: Renaming all symbols in libmp(3)) Message-ID: <20090227082417.GA55567@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <49a79a4e.jj/fvw29lwxNJgz%2B%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <20090226180756.GX19161@hoeg.nl> <20090226204243.GA96251@zim.MIT.EDU> <49A70092.6030601@gmx.de> <49a79a4e.jj/fvw29lwxNJgz%2B%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:46:22PM -0800, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > > >> By default, LLVM has a built-in prototype of pow(), similar to > > >> GCC. Unlike GCC, LLVM raises a compiler error by default ... > > > ... it's invalid code to have a function named pow() > > in a hosted environment which is not /The/ pow(). > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > I don't suppose LLVM supports a commmand-line switch to use embedded > mode instead of hosted? of course it does.... -ffreestanding
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090227082417.GA55567>