Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:59:00 +0200 From: Mel Flynn <fbsd.mobile@rachie.is-a-geek.net> To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Cc: Sam Leffler <sam@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Switching from wired to wireless getting "network down" Message-ID: <200903311859.00642.fbsd.mobile@rachie.is-a-geek.net> In-Reply-To: <49D243A8.5050601@freebsd.org> References: <1238217783.00093348.1238205603@10.7.7.3> <200903311054.35181.mel.flynn@mailing.thruhere.net> <49D243A8.5050601@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 31 March 2009 18:24:08 Sam Leffler wrote: > Mel Flynn wrote: > > Great! Does this also work for hostap mode now? I'd like to unify my > > internal network, currently using rum as hostap. > > If the answer is no, I pledge to file a PR. ;) > > I don't understand what you're looking for but it's unlikely this will > do what you want. lagg's failover protocol acts like a single-position > switch funneling packets to one of several devices (all of which are > assigned the same mac address). What I'd like is my wireless and wired network to be on the same /24 and my hostap/gateway to nat between lagg0 and tun0. As you've now described lagg, this doesn't seem viable and I'll have to look for a different solution. The reason I want it, is that it greatly simplifies my rdr rules and I can seemlessly plug in/out my laptop without having to change default route or getting arp errors if I use lagg on it. Wireless routers (at least my retired Linksys) seem to be able to handle a unified wired/wireless network just fine, is there anything comparable in FreeBSD? -- Mel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200903311859.00642.fbsd.mobile>