Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 14:24:20 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net> To: barney_cordoba@yahoo.com Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Advice on a multithreaded netisr patch? Message-ID: <20090405212420.31A311CC50@ptavv.es.net> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 05 Apr 2009 10:25:41 PDT." <285323.31546.qm@web63901.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 10:25:41 -0700 (PDT) > From: Barney Cordoba <barney_cordoba@yahoo.com> > Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org > > > As an aside, why is Kip doing development on a Chelsio card rather > than a more mainstream product such as Intel or Broadcom that would > generate more widespread interest? Because Chelsio pays him better than the makers of the "more mainstream" products. And, at 10GE, Chelsio and Myricom seem to have stronger products than others. (Just my opinion and not that of The US Dept. of Energy, The university of California, or Lawrence Berkeley National Labs.) I just hope Kip's legal problems are resolved soon. FreeBSD really needs him. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090405212420.31A311CC50>