Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 21:04:05 +1200 From: Jonathan Chen <jonc@chen.org.nz> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: console-kit-daemon leaking file descriptors? Message-ID: <20090419090405.GA3500@osiris.chen.org.nz> In-Reply-To: <1240123521.1354.27.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <20090418105855.GA61453@osiris.chen.org.nz> <1240080177.18976.63.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20090418204411.GA73963@osiris.chen.org.nz> <1240092470.18976.80.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20090418233629.GA89603@osiris.chen.org.nz> <1240109972.1354.6.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20090419063220.GA99153@osiris.chen.org.nz> <1240123521.1354.27.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 02:45:21AM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 18:32 +1200, Jonathan Chen wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 10:59:32PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
[...]
> > > Then that means you have a deeper problem. Most likely you do not have
> > > procfs mounted on /proc. The console or /var/log/messages should have
> > > warnings.
> >
> > Hmm. Yes it does. I wasn't aware that GNOME required procfs mounted.
>
> It's in the general GNOME FAQ and HAL FAQ. You definitely need procfs
> mounted.
The wording in both the FAQs appear to imply that procfs is optional.
Perhaps it should be changed to say that procfs is required for GNOME
to function correctly?
Cheers.
--
Jonathan Chen <jonc@chen.org.nz>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"If everything's under control, you're going too slow"
- Mario Andretti
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090419090405.GA3500>