Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 26 May 2009 14:09:48 +0200
From:      Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se>
To:        Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc:        Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>, ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: make.conf no x option
Message-ID:  <20090526120948.GA14134@owl.midgard.homeip.net>
In-Reply-To: <m2r5ycdr6c.wl%randy@psg.com>
References:  <m2vdnodrq5.wl%randy@psg.com> <20090526113714.GC1043@straylight.m.ringlet.net> <m2r5ycdr6c.wl%randy@psg.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 08:44:43PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
> >> as so many folk build server-only, there must e a make.conf or whatever
> >> option to tell ports that you just do not want an x server or any of
> >> it's 500kg friends.  but i can not seem to find it.
> > I think you're looking for WITHOUT_X11=yes :)
> 
> i have that.  i still get a lot of x with some ports.  i will try to
> keep a watch for which ones.


Well, there are many ports which depend unconditionally upon X.
If you install one of them (or some other port which depends on one of them)
you will get X, no questions asked.

WITHOUT_X11 is useful for those ports which have an optional dependency upon
X, but that is all it does.


There does not exist any flag which tells the ports-system to refuse to
build any ports which depend on X, which seems to be what you want. 


-- 
<Insert your favourite quote here.>
Erik Trulsson
ertr1013@student.uu.se



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090526120948.GA14134>