Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 14:02:30 -0500 From: David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net> To: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> Cc: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD & Software RAID Message-ID: <20090527190230.GB9937@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> In-Reply-To: <200905271152.34237.kirk@strauser.com> References: <4A1AA3DC.5020300@network-i.net> <200905271048.27837.kirk@strauser.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905271832320.53013@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <200905271152.34237.kirk@strauser.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:52:33AM -0500, Kirk Strauser wrote: > On Wednesday 27 May 2009 11:40:51 am Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > > you talk about performance or if it work at all? > > Both, really. If they have to code up macros to support identical > operations (such as addition) on both platforms, and accidentally > forget to use the macro in some place, then voila: untested code. I haven't looked at the ZFS code but this sort of thing is exactly why all code I write uses int8_t, int16_t, int32_t, uint8_t, ... even when the first thing I have to do with a new compiler is to work out the proper typedefs to create them. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090527190230.GB9937>