Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:22:12 +0900 From: Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh@gmail.com> To: Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: your mail Message-ID: <20090612082212.GE72855@michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr> In-Reply-To: <E1MF1du-0005tm-HL@kabab.cs.huji.ac.il> References: <E1MF1du-0005tm-HL@kabab.cs.huji.ac.il>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:57:42AM +0300, Danny Braniss wrote: > latest -stable (June 11) is causing problems: > MB is intel SE7320VP21, > > msk0: Ethernet address: 00:0e:0c:6a:85:a8 > miibus0: <MII bus> on msk0 > e1000phy0: <Marvell 88E1111 Gigabit PHY> PHY 0 on miibus0 > e1000phy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, > 1000baseT-FDX, auto > > msk0: watchdog timeout (missed Tx interrupts) -- recovering > msk0: watchdog timeout (missed Tx interrupts) -- recovering > msk0: watchdog timeout (missed Tx interrupts) -- recovering > ... > I think there was not much msk(4) changes in stable. msk(4) in CURRENT has a lot changes to support newer controllers. Does msk(4) in CURRENT make any difference? Also please show me dmesg output(msk(4) related one) to know which controller you have. Btw, are you using MSI? > cheers, > danny > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090612082212.GE72855>