Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:33:56 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky <erich@apsara.com.sg> To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> Cc: bf1783@googlemail.com, Manish Jain <invalid.pointer@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Erik Osterholm <freebsd-lists-erik@erikosterholm.org> Subject: Re: The question of moving vi to /binHi, Message-ID: <200906261033.58894.erich@apsara.com.sg> In-Reply-To: <20090626040230.18f606b1.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <4A430505.2020909@gmail.com> <200906260955.50697.erich@apsara.com.sg> <20090626040230.18f606b1.freebsd@edvax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 26 June 2009 am 10:02:30 Polytropon wrote: > Polytropon > From Magdeburg, Germany big brother is watching me. An xterm just came up with this message: "The default editor in FreeBSD is vi, which is efficient to use when you have learned it, but somewhat user-unfriendly. To use ee (an easier but less powerful editor) instead, set the environment variable EDITOR to /usr/bin/ee" Isn't this the best reasoning why it should stay as it is? Erich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200906261033.58894.erich>