Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 01:38:13 +0200 From: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Cc: Dag-Erling =?utf-8?q?Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>, Maslan <maslanbsd@gmail.com> Subject: Re: sosend() and mbuf Message-ID: <200908040138.14743.max@love2party.net> In-Reply-To: <86fxc84ksj.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <319cceca0908030119i3432a495ya60aa431dab0e1b1@mail.gmail.com> <86k51k4kvl.fsf@ds4.des.no> <86fxc84ksj.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 04 August 2009 00:03:40 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav wrote: > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no> writes: > > One thing that springs to mind is that kern_open() will dereference > > td->td_proc, and AFAIK kthread_create() does not associate the thread > > with a process. > > This is wrong, and contradicts what I wrote further down. Just ignore > it. IIRC, kernel threads don't have root. =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200908040138.14743.max>