Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:39:03 +0200 From: David Naylor <naylor.b.david@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Monolithic vs Modular Kernel? Message-ID: <200912100939.07116.naylor.b.david@gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1310394.lN7RTTZLqu Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, What are the pros and cons of building a stripped down kernel and loading a= ll=20 the missing parts via modules (such that you end up with the same=20 functionality as generic kernel) vs having a kernel with all the modules bu= ilt=20 in?=20 Also, is there anyway to detect if there are hardware without drivers (such= as=20 a sound card without any snd_ loaded) and to detect the type of device (e.g= =2E=20 network, usb, sound, graphics)? Lastly, is there any way to determine what 'modules' a kernel is build with? Regards, David --nextPart1310394.lN7RTTZLqu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAksgpZsACgkQUaaFgP9pFrLQ6QCcDOUmNUueK5DKITzE7B0aQ/7m hIwAn0f5k3n9UAc7QyW/JG2Eo71mPNCF =Twpg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1310394.lN7RTTZLqu--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200912100939.07116.naylor.b.david>