Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 14:17:22 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Patch to Makefile.inc1 to mention which kernel config is being installed Message-ID: <20100105141557.G88477@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <20100105141108.GO86359@bunrab.catwhisker.org> References: <20100105132921.GN86359@bunrab.catwhisker.org> <20100105135828.K88477@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20100105141108.GO86359@bunrab.catwhisker.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 01:59:13PM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: >> On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, David Wolfskill wrote: >> >>> Attached patch is against head; for the above, I had patched stable/7. >>> >>> Thoughts? >> >> INSTKERNNAME rather than INSTALLKERNEL? > > Well, I was interested in knowing which config was being used, not so > much what the name of the subdirectory in /boot was going to be. > > (Default value for INSTKERNNAME is "kernel", which isn't something I > find useful to report.) Woopps. Cache-corruption;-) The original one is fine then. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb It will not break if you know what you are doing.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100105141557.G88477>